The Problem with Gifted Programs

thought leadership

Why Your Highest Achievers Might Be Your Most Fragile Learners

The problem with gifted programs isn’t the students. They’re doing what they’ve always done: performing well. The problem is the story we tell about why they’re doing well—and what we assume they need next.

Here’s an uncomfortable truth: we don’t usually identify students as gifted and then watch them succeed. We observe their success and then label them as gifted. It’s backwards. And that circular logic creates a system that rewards early advantage while missing something far more important.

What we call “giftedness” is almost always the result of a backstory—access to learning opportunities, strategic effort, early support, responsive teaching. We mistake performance for readiness. And in doing so, we create programs that recognise success rather than develop it.

The Gifted Trap

I’ve seen it play out countless times. A student coasts through primary school, hits real difficulty in Year 9 or 10—and unravels. Not because they lack ability, but because they’ve never had to build the tools to deal with struggle.

They were praised for being gifted, not taught how to become capable.

Many students identified as “gifted” early on start to believe it’s who they are—not just how they performed. Their identity gets locked in as “the smart one.” And suddenly, challenge becomes a threat. They avoid tasks that might show cracks. They treat mistakes as failures, not feedback. Effort becomes evidence that maybe they weren’t so gifted after all.

What was meant to lift them up now holds them back.

What’s Actually Happening in Most Programs

Let’s be honest about what many gifted programs actually look like:

Acceleration without development. Students move through content faster, but without deliberate teaching of how to navigate challenge. They learn to value speed, not depth.

Enrichment without direction. Open-ended projects can be powerful—if students already know how to manage complexity. Most don’t. Some thrive. Others coast.

High expectations, low support. The myth that gifted students are fine on their own. So instead of structured feedback and coaching, they’re given complex work and expected to figure it out.

What’s missing is the very thing these students need most: explicit development of Learnership.
 

The Missing Multiplier

Learnership is the expertise students develop in learning itself. It’s what transforms effort into growth, mistakes into insights, and feedback into strategy.
Through five key behaviours—engaging in the Learning Zone, applying effective effort, learning from mistakes, acting on feedback, and cultivating Habits of Mind—Learnership helps students become more powerful learners. It’s not a rejection of excellence. It’s a way to create more of it, in more students, and sustain it over time.
 
Achievement without Learnership is fragile. Achievement built on Learnership is sustainable—and transferable.
The question isn’t whether we’ve missed some gifted students. The question is whether “giftedness” is even the right concept to begin with. Instead of asking who is worthy of extension, we should be asking how we design learning experiences that grow capability in all students.
 

A Different Path Forward

You don’t need to shut down your gifted program. You don’t even need to change its name. But you do need to change what it grows.

Programs built on Learnership take a different approach. They don’t just support learners who are already excelling. They help more learners become excellent. Because Learnership isn’t a trait. It’s a skillset—one that can be taught, coached, and refined.

This means shifting from selection to cultivation. From performance to growth. From outcome-based success to process-based excellence.

Your Blueprint for Transformation

I’ve captured the complete framework in “The Problem with Gifted Programs”—a comprehensive white paper that reveals why traditional approaches often fail our highest performers, how the Learnership Matrix provides a developmental pathway for all learners, and practical strategies for redesigning programs that build capability rather than just recognise it.
You’ll find research-backed insights, implementation pathways for navigating policy constraints, and tools for measuring what actually matters—not just achievement, but growth in learning itself.

Because in the end, its not about whos gifted. Its about whos growing.

Download the white paper to discover how your school can move from filtering for brilliance to building it.

More from this category